| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1038
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 22:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
I will preface this post by saying I am already breaking out into hives, because I want to limit the... .. . . the.... . . ....trolling...
There. I said it. Moving on! I want to hear some suggestions from the community on things you would like to see added, changed, removed, etc...I will post the ideas on this, the original post, so it's easy to read. Yes, I will even post bad ideas that I don't agree with.
Lastly, I would really like to hear from some of the lower class wormhole people. N0mex, The Night Crew, Greywing Alliance (if you guys have a decent english speaker), and groups like that.
DISCUSS! No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1038
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 22:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:Hmmm C7 wormholes would be cool. 
I hate you with a passion, but I will add it  No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1038
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 22:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
If that feature gave me a paycheck like work, I would be there for you hahaha No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1040
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 22:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:Bane I would like to ask you. How do you see the wormhole community evolving over time?
Also while features suggested to you by the community are nice how you as CSM representative would be able to implement them?
I want to wait and see how the T3 changes look. I would love to see a change in the type of fleet we typically see in wh space (1 guardian per armor t3, etc) Being in a corp now that actively tries to use varied fleets, it's made Eve a lot more fun for me, and I think others would feel the same. I would also like to see people relying less on capitals. Jumping a 30 man fleet with no caps into someones wormhole, only to see 6 dreads, 4 carriers, and 30 T3s is a bit much. However, I don't think that is something CCP needs to work on. That is something that we as a community should work on
As far as features I would like to see implemented, here is a small sample:
1) C4s should have 2 statics, a low class and a high class one. I wish remembered who came up with that, so I could give them massive credit for it. This would allow c4s to be valuable, to both the people living in them, and it would bridge low class and high class wormhole space even more. Want to bring low class wormholers to c5/c6 space? Make it easier without breaking how wormhole space works.
2) I would like to see lower end wh space be worth more than running L4 missions. How that would be accomplished, I am not sure at the moment. Whether people like it or not, low class wormholes are the most crowded of all wormholes. They need some love.
3) Change black holes to something that people don't avoid like the girl at a party with herpes. I would love to see something that benefits battleships in some form or fashion. Large gun bonus, mass reduction, etc...
Lastly, communicating ideas to CCP effectively doesn't happen without ample communication, not only from the CSM side of things, but from the community as well. There are people out there far more intelligent and forward thinking than I am, and I want to hear from those folks. Who knows? I might even make a wormhole cabinet for real, to sit down and discuss ideas/solutions with said group. No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1042
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 23:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:Bane while you responded on what you would do you did not really answer the question how? How will you satisfy the hunger of wspace for all those fancy features?
It is really easy to talk about features but when it comes to hard work it can be hard to promote.
I can definitely agree with the promotion part. Just having meetings with CCP and getting on the soapbox isn't enough. This is nothing personal against you, but when CCP asked for a video to show the wh wobble, that should have been ready to show. Providing a visual component is far more effective to promote change/ideas than just telling them. An example if I may.
An example if I may. I do air conditioning repair and installation. A lot of times I have to try and explain to people what went wrong. Very few people actually understand what I am yapping about, so I have learned to always show them in person (if possible) what is going wrong. Telling someone their fan motor isn't functioning is one thing, but showing them makes it a lot easier to get the point across.
Secondly, people have to understand that while wormholers have elected you to represent their viewpoint, it's not just wormhole space that will be discussed. We are but a small slice of the Eve pie, so the little bit of time we get to express ourselves needs to be made the most of. No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1044
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 11:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
I get your idea, but I think we need less friendly and more shooty shooty No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1052
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 22:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:
You can improve gameplay through mechanics and stuff, but you can't drive conflict or create content with a module. At the end of the day its you the players that do that.
This x1000 No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1055
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 14:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote: A month later, all black holes are inhabited and we have a module that allows an armour T3 gang to a fight in a pulsar...
That is content and a conflict creator brought about by the introduction of a module.
Jesus f**k. This statement alone shows that you are your own problem
Get out of your armor T3s and reship to something else. As shocking as that might be to you and some of your buddies, that actually works. We live in a pulsar we own armor ships. Why? Because fights happen somewhere other than home. No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1055
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 15:29:00 -
[9] - Quote
Cylin Rath wrote:Be it through a change to existing SMAs, assembly arrays, or some new mobile deployable, I would like to be able to repackage ships at a POS.
I also think ship movement tracking would be good:
Make it possible for scouts to examine/scan a wormhole for evidence of ships that have passed through it. These scanned GÇ£tracksGÇ¥ would fade over time becoming harder to detect, or the results detected have a greater chance of being inaccurate. The wormhole scanner could be a mid slot module that is affected by a skill. The higher the skill level the greater accuracy of scans. It would work something like:
Scout jumps through an unexplored wormhole and scans out the system. He finds a few wormholes. After warping to the hole he de-cloaks, locks the wormhole, and activates his hole scanner.
The results would not have to be text, cool multicolor visual effects showing up on the wormhole would be sweet, but the scan output would give the scout info such as:
GÇ£A single [small, medium, large, huge] ship has has transversed this wormhole [minutes ago, very recently, a few hours ago].GÇ¥
The output would stack as more ships go through a hole and vary based on approximate ship quantity, size, and time since passing through.
GÇ£A [single, few, many] small ship(s) have transversed this wormhole very recently.GÇ¥ GÇ£A few medium sized ships and small ships have transversed this wormhole a few hours.GÇ¥ GÇ£A small ship transversed this wormhole a few minutes ago and huge ship traversed this wormhole many hours ago.GÇ¥
As time passes the scans could become more inaccurate based on the age of the ship tracks, pilot skill level, random environmental effects etc.
That is a pretty neat idea. No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1055
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 16:04:00 -
[10] - Quote
Paikis wrote:New deployable: Wormhole Effect Inhibitor 1 minute anchor/online timer Wormhole effects do not affect any ship within 300km of this module.
A few things here, if this were in game:
- Shorten the range by a large margin - Do NOT allow on grid with a wormhole or POS - Does not allow warping (same effect as a bubble)
No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1055
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 21:14:00 -
[11] - Quote
I have evicted so many people who never fired a single shot to defend their home. I would even put it in the 90% range. It's been that many. That won't change by making their things easier to shoot. No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1055
|
Posted - 2014.02.23 22:45:00 -
[12] - Quote
"He's liberated himself from traditional f*****g asthetics and techniques, in effect, creating a big f*****g pile of shiit" - Chopper Ried
No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1067
|
Posted - 2014.02.26 02:57:00 -
[13] - Quote
Joshua Lorne wrote:
Other then that, the only thing really broken is Data/Relic/Ghost sites being nothing but worthless clutter on my scan window. But I can live with that.
I agree with all your points but this one. You are missing out on some decent isk if you pass these by. If you can stomach the hacking game, it's pretty good. No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1067
|
Posted - 2014.02.26 14:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
NoHo doesn't always post on the forums. But when they do, they make a lot of sense. No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1067
|
Posted - 2014.02.26 17:22:00 -
[15] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Bane, aren't roaming sleepers and many of the other ideas in this thread "legit" ideas? The list is looking a little small...
I will update when I have some time. No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1174
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 22:08:00 -
[16] - Quote
Duke Wendo wrote:Oh well, I didn't realise having stuff outside of a massive POS or station would inconvenience the residents of the most dangerous area of space and they might lose their stuff to dangerous fleets of dangerous pvp people! What was I thinking!
We must have everything inside the POS or station to protect us all from nasty timezone warriors. I also think POCOs should have double their hit points and their reinforce timer should be at least 10 days to give adequate time for a defence fleet to form.
We should have clone jumps and wormhole generators and stations and conveniences like high sec space.
Where are all the people that want w-space to be difficult?
You guys sicken me. I want my money back.
:/
Sorry that so few people actually liked your idea. I am sure if you keep at the brainstorming, something will come up that people will like No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1174
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 02:39:00 -
[17] - Quote
Unfortunately, I will not be running for CSM. After taking a hard look at my schedule, and speaking with both current and former CSM canidates, I would not be able to devote the time to it.
Also, how is this for a change suggestion:
- While in siege mode, dreads cannot target any ship smaller than a battleship.
This would essentially fix dread fappiing...errr blapping, while still allowing them to be useful against battleships, capitals, and structures.
No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1175
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 11:18:00 -
[18] - Quote
Quinn Corvez wrote:Bane Nucleus wrote:Unfortunately, I will not be running for CSM...
- While in siege mode, dreads cannot target any ship smaller than a battleship.
This would essentially fix dread fappiing...errr blapping, while still allowing them to be useful against battleships, capitals, and structures.
It's probably a good thing that you aren't running if you have ideas like that.
Pot. Kettle. Black  No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1176
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 00:47:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tul Breetai wrote: Ur just missing a self-destruct with 1,000,000,000 omni environmental damage!
 No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1177
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 17:14:00 -
[20] - Quote
Confirming people want blob rewards for blobbing. No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1177
|
Posted - 2014.03.08 16:59:00 -
[21] - Quote
Tul Breetai wrote:Confirming alcohol was used in the creation of this thread.
I do not consume alcohol sir.
No trolling please |

Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1178
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 06:09:00 -
[22] - Quote
I think black holes should have changing effects. Every day after down time, give them different effect. This would add some variety to wormhole space, as well as getting people active in those systems because it wouldn't have the black hole **** effect No trolling please |
| |
|